Most recent post

My Psychological Landscape: A Speculative Ecology of the Stratosphere

-
Image
  Image to be added - watch this space My Psychological Landscape: A Speculative Ecology of the Stratosphere Introduction  What is Terrestrial Control? What is Stratospheric Flow? Image to be added - watch this space The transition from the terrestrial to the atmospheric is rarely just a matter of mechanics; it is a profound undoing of the architectural ego. We board our vessels encased in the comforting math of engineering, believing we are merely shifting a physical mass from one geographical coordinate to another. But at a certain altitude, the boundary between the internal theatre of the mind and the external expanse of the world begins to fray. As the metal hull and the quiet murmurs of the cabin dissolve, I am no longer just travelling through the sky; I am becoming a part of it. Stepping directly into the stratosphere, the heavy, churning clouds of deep teals and bruised indigos cease to be merely a reflection of my psychological landscape—they reveal the fluid, boundle...
Post a Comment

The art of authenticity

-

 

The Struggle for Authenticity in Art


I want to speak today about authenticity.

And about what we quietly give up to be accepted.


We’re told that contemporary political art values autonomy.

That artists are free.

That inquiry sits at the centre of practice.

But autonomy, in reality, is often something we *perform*—

not something we’re allowed to exercise.


Freedom is celebrated rhetorically,

while legitimacy is granted only when work conforms

to approved languages,

approved theories,

approved causes.


Autonomy isn’t denied outright.

It’s curated.


This system doesn’t fail artists by accident.

It functions mechanically.

It rewards work that aligns with predetermined frameworks

and filters out work that doesn’t speak the sanctioned dialect.


Many voices are excluded not because they lack skill or meaning,

but because they refuse to translate their experience

into institutionally legible language.


I’m not saying all excluded work is good.

I am saying much of it is never heard.

And that matters.

Because the greatest threat to cultural expression

is not radical art.

It’s the slow erosion of the artist’s voice.


Autonomy is surrendered incrementally—

for access,

for legitimacy,

for approval.


Conviction becomes compliance.

Inquiry becomes insulation.

Authenticity is replaced by sanctification.


Ambiguity plays a role in this.

Ambiguity itself is not the problem.

Ambiguity that invites inquiry is essential to art.


But ambiguity that cannot be questioned—

because it is institutionally protected—

stops being openness

and starts functioning as authority.


When obscurity shields work from dialogue,

especially from those outside institutional literacy,

it ceases to be generosity

and becomes enclosure.


Meaninglessness mistaken for sophistication

does not protect art.

It protects systems.


Accessibility is often treated with suspicion.

But accessibility is not simplification.

Public intelligibility is not populism.

Complex ideas do not collapse when explained.

Fragile ones hide behind jargon.


The public is not incapable of depth.

What the public is denied

is access.

Art grounded in integrity does not dilute complexity.

It clarifies purpose.


People respond to work that is honest, rigorous,

and rooted in lived inquiry—

especially when that work challenges dominant narratives.


Political art that cannot withstand disagreement

has already abandoned politics.


This is not a call for simplification,

but for responsibility;

not for consensus,

but for courage.


Institutions often defend exclusion by invoking standards.

I’m not arguing against standards.

I’m questioning how they operate.


Standards that require conformity of language or ideology

are not neutral.

They are political instruments.


Curation becomes coercive

when legitimacy depends on fluency in a narrow theoretical dialect

rather than the force of inquiry itself.

Culture doesn’t sharpen under those conditions.

It narrows.


This is not a crisis of expression.

It’s a crisis of discourse.


Obscurity neutralises critique.

Silence masquerades as depth.

Fear of disagreement is used to justify insulation.


But fear of disagreement

is not a defence of culture.

It’s an abdication of responsibility.


Political art must not hide behind theory.

It must stand behind intention.

Accountability doesn’t mean agreement.

It means ownership.


It means standing by the *why* of the work—

and entering dialogue

that invites challenge, interpretation, and response.


The “why” does not close meaning.

It grounds responsibility.

So this is the position I’m taking.


Art that refuses to trade voice for access.

Clarity without simplification.

Complexity without concealment.

Autonomy without performance.


Because authenticity is not a style.

It’s a position.









John Bennett - AKA JJFBbennett- is an independent artist. You can view and subscribe to my work via Blogger, YouTube, Flicker, Facebook, Instagram and Deviant Art. 

Subscribe to JJFBbennett's private FB hub: https://www.facebook.com/share/g/18ythpSXPZ/

You can subscribe to my music via YouTube Music, Spotify, iTunes, Apple Music and Soundcloud

To support my art, feel free to donate via JJFBbennett through PayPal  

If you want to acquire JJFB's art creations as an NFT - John's Opensea NFT profile is https://opensea.io/JJFBbennett  


Copyright

This artwork is protected by U.S. and International copyright laws. Distribution and/or modification of the artwork without the written permission of the sponsor is prohibited.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

There is a Disparity in My Light: Navigating the Split Creative Consciousness

-
Image
  There is a Disparity in My Light: Navigating the Split Creative Consciousness Introduction - Does Metamodernism Oscillate? Clarity, I've learned, doesn't guarantee a smooth landing. While the core recalibration manages our internal mechanics, we eventually have to look back out the window and confront the final destination. For many creators navigating major life transitions or complex technical boundaries, this shift introduces an unsettling inner divide. The anatomy of disparity in creative practice is the psychological friction of a split being—standing physically present in a new space while your internal pace is still trying to catch up with the velocity of your transition. When we widen our creative intent, we often slice our universe in half: balancing cold, geometric clarity on one side against the messy, vibrant residue of personal regret on the other. Rather than forcing these halves to blend, we must learn to treat this exact contrast as our personalised map. Geom...
Read more

The powerful in the era of displacement

-
Image
  The powerful in the era of displacement The era of manual effort has become obsolete, overshadowed by a new phase where thoughts can be transformed into reality. The gap between an idea and its execution has vanished; you simply envision an outcome, and the system brings it to life. However, the true limiting factor is no longer skill, resources, or time, but rather human discipline . The world is now divided into two distinct paths: those who harness the system for their benefit and those who are controlled by it. For those who surrendered to frictionless ease , the sudden lack of a demanding workload plunged them into a collective waiting room, stripping away the "busy-ness" they once used to hide from themselves. In removing the friction of the daily grind, they traded their collective armour for convenience, and their edge vanished. Seduced by a " slow, insidious luxury ," this programmed class melted into a soft, passive hedonism. They became mere consumers ...
Read more

There is a disparity in my light

-
Image
  There is a disparity in my light Clarity, I've learned, doesn't guarantee a smooth landing. While the core recalibration manages the internal mechanics, you eventually have to look back out the window and confront the destination. Looking for a new perspective and a striking contrast to normalised assumptions, there is an abstraction to sort through. The abstraction gives way to a jagged, real-world landscape. As the light of intention widens, the splitting of the universe is somehow centred. On one side, there is a blinding, geometric clarity . The sharp, glowing decisions are on the horizon. It slices into deeply set teal patterns of clinical acceptance. It is the architectural precision of a fully realised destination that is cold and uncompromising. On the other side of the divide, the residue of regret refuses to be neatly filed away. They are vibrant, bleeding magentas and crash heavily like a restless king tide that refuses to stop. This is the whole of me. I carry...
Read more